Getting your brand found on ChatGPT
So the whole opportunity is one sentence: you hold 24.5% of the non-branded organic clicks in your category, and every extra 1% is worth about $7,800 a year. Your branded traffic is not part of this and does not change.
Built on your own numbers, with one honest caveat up front: because of the attribution gap, we do not yet have a measured organic conversion rate for your site, so this model does not pretend to one. Instead it uses what is solid: 113 orders on $2.22M gives an average order of $19,655, and across all 247,816 visits that makes a visit worth $8.96, however it arrived. We value an organic click at that blended figure rather than guessing a channel rate. Treat the dollar columns as directional; the moment real conversion data is available, we re-run the model on measured numbers and these figures firm up in both directions. Every column below is non-branded, and your branded traffic sits on top of all of it, unchanged. Modelled, plus or minus 40%
| Case | Share of the non-branded market | Non-branded clicks / yr | Non-branded revenue / yr | New revenue / yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | 24.5% | 21,282 | $190,700 | — |
| Conservative | 33% | 28,710 | $257,200 | +$66,500 |
| Mid | 42% | 36,540 | $327,400 | +$136,700 |
| High | 52% | 45,240 | $405,400 | +$214,700 |
At your average order of $19,655, the mid case is about seven extra cabins a year, every year, compounding as the content keeps ranking.
Triangulated NZ search volume per category, August 2026. The full keyword, prompt and cluster research behind every number here lives in The data tab. GKP + Ahrefs + SEMrush
We score every brand out of 100 against our AEO Maturity Model: four pillars (Technical, Content, Authority, Measurement), each out of 25. Certified is 80 out of 100, Professional on all four, the standard we build clients to. You are at 40 today, and unusually, your content is the strength and the plumbing is the problem.
The detailed findings, how the scoring works, and where every number comes from are in the appendix.
A cabin is a considered purchase. Your buyers spend weeks researching consent rules, foundations, timber, power and cost before they get anywhere near a checkout, and they now ask those questions in two places, a search box and an AI chat. The demand is deep, most of your direct competitors are tiny, and the AI layer has already started answering.
| Term | Searches / mo (NZ) | Your rank now | AI Overview live? |
|---|---|---|---|
| tiny homes nz | 5,100 | Page 5+ | - |
| garden sheds nz | 4,400 | Page 4+ | - |
| sheds nz | 2,150 | Page 2 | - |
| sleepout | 1,300 | Page 2 | Yes |
| kitset cabins nz | 1,000 | Page 3 | - |
| she shed | 880 | Page 2 | Yes |
| pool house | 880 | 9 | - |
| alpine cabins | 480 | 6 | - |
Search volume triangulated across Google Keyword Planner, SEMrush and Ahrefs (median of the sources returning a figure), NZ. Your rank is your current average Google position from Search Console. The pattern: bright spots where you have a dedicated page (pool house, alpine cabins), page two to five everywhere else, including your namesake term. Page two is where 21,282 clicks came from; the top three is where the other 60,000 live. The full 112-term triangulation is in The data tab, including the terms your own Search Console proved that the tools understate, like garden rooms and alpine pods, marked "GSC-proven". GKP + Ahrefs + SEMrush GSC
Zoom out and the full category is about 36,400 searches a month once the long tail is counted, of which roughly 7,250 a month are winnable organic clicks, plus the AI-chat questions counted separately. In the live results the pattern is simple: you win log cabins and kitset tiny homes, you are contested on she sheds, and you are missing from page one on kitset cabins and sleepouts, the highest-intent terms in the book, where a field of much smaller specialists currently holds the ground. The full 130-question library, cluster maths and territory plan live in the appendix and The data tab.
The table in the executive summary is built from four numbers, all of them yours, and all of them non-branded. Here is the chain in full.
Roughly one search in five survives ads, shopping carousels and AI answers as a winnable organic click, and you currently take one click in four of those. Modelled
Each visit to your site is worth $8.96, because 247,816 visits produced $2.22M in orders. That is the figure every case in the table multiplies. It is a blended site-wide value, used because no per-channel conversion rate can currently be trusted; it firms up the day real conversion data is connected.
That is the whole model: win more of the 87,000 clicks.
The mid case arriving, on non-branded revenue: certified inside the six months, the system handed to you at month 6, all of it live by month 12 (~10% live by month 3, ~35% by month 6, ~70% by month 9). Hover any point for the maths. Modelled, directional
Two levers, both measured. Click-through on the impressions you already get: you appear on 525,595 non-branded impressions a year but convert them at 1.21%, because your average position is 15. Moving the terms you already rank for from page two into the top three multiplies the clicks without a single new impression. And more impressions, as the consent, cost and comparison questions you have no ranking page for start to rank. The conservative case assumes only the first lever really lands; the high case assumes both do.
Every figure here is non-branded. Roughly two-thirds of each case is organic search and one-third is AI search, modelled from the prompt library demand in the appendix. Total organic run-rate is your branded traffic, unchanged, plus the non-branded column in the executive summary table.
A done-for-you AI and Search transformation over six months, built and run on our side so there is nothing for your team to learn or maintain. It moves through three phases: foundations (the mobile speed scores, the schema clean-up, the attribution rebuild so every order traces to a channel, your baseline), owning your territories (the consent and cost answer hub, the sleepout and kitset cabin hubs, and reshaping your existing 160 posts into the answers engines cite, with new production starting once everything is calibrated to your voice), and authority and compounding (extending the authority lead you already hold over every direct competitor into the citations AI trusts). We move into each phase as your site is ready for it rather than on a stopwatch. Behind it, we are building the platform you will own, built for ecommerce brands: by the end of your six months it is a system your team can log into and run. Everything is yours to keep: the foundations, the content, the links and your AI-Ready certification.
The full breakdown, deliverables, your time commitment and investment live in The offer tab.
Traffic, orders, revenue and rankings are from your own Google Analytics and Search Console, last 12 months to 16 August 2026, NZD. Search volumes triangulated across Google Keyword Planner, SEMrush and Ahrefs (NZ), August 2026. Competitor Domain Ratings from Ahrefs. AEO score from our AEO Maturity Model against a live crawl and a mobile Lighthouse run. Revenue figures are directional, modelled from your own order value and traffic, and are not a guarantee of results. Investment details are set out separately.
You have built a real brand in a category you named yourselves into: $2.22M of tracked online orders in 12 months, a 17-product kitset range from $11,995 to $76,990, NZ-wide delivery and a content library your competitors have not come close to. The foundations are good. This is growth on a proven base, not a rescue.
| Channel | Sessions / yr | Enquiries | Attributed sales | Read |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paid Social | 78,340 | 1,252 | $0 | A third of all traffic, no order ever attributed to it |
| Cross-network (paid) | 54,574 | 849 | $101,069 | Google's blended paid channel |
| Direct | 34,244 | 524 | $68,319 | Brand strength showing up |
| Organic Search | 34,024 | 584 | $91,514 | Your best acquisition channel, and under-fed |
| Paid Search | 21,059 | 654 | $85,818 | Rented visibility on the same terms organic can own |
| Unassigned | 2,507 | 119 | $1,874,289 | 93 of your 113 orders, attribution lost at purchase |
GA4, last 12 months to 16 August 2026, NZD. Enquiries are GA4 key events (forms, calls, downloads). The Unassigned row is the finding: the purchase event fires, but by the time it does, GA4 no longer knows where the buyer came from, so $1.87M of revenue credits no channel at all. Until that is fixed, no channel figure in this table can be fully trusted, which is exactly why the model values a visit at the blended $8.96 rather than any per-channel rate. GA4
Non-branded search is 94% of your impressions and 77% of your clicks, but the click-through tells the real story: branded queries convert at 6.37% and non-branded at just 1.21%, because on category terms you sit at position 15, not the top three. The visibility is there; the position is not. GSC
Here is what sits behind the score, and who fixes each piece. Unusually for our audits, the content engine already exists. The work is speed, schema and measurement, then shaping what you have written into answers.
| Finding | Status | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| AI crawlers welcomed (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Perplexity) | All allowed | Done |
| Content library (160 posts, FAQ hub, 28 use-case pages) | Strong, fresh to August | Reshape into citable answers |
| Product schema (price, stock, SKU, brand) | Present and valid | Add reviews and fix expired prices |
| Legacy agency schema polluting every page | AUD currency, a self-rated 5/5, another agency's logo | Days |
| FAQPage schema (27-question FAQ, 21 FAQ posts) | None anywhere | Days, the cheapest win on the site |
| Page typing (shop and category pages marked as articles) | Wrong site-wide | Days |
| Mobile Core Web Vitals | Failing (Lighthouse 24, LCP 19.9s, CLS 0.475) | Weeks, the biggest technical lever |
| Attribution and AI-visibility measurement | $1.87M unattributed, no AI tracking | Week one, then a monthly panel |
The single highest-leverage fix is speed. To be clear about what the numbers mean: the site loads promptly on a good connection, and the figures above come from Google's Lighthouse lab test, which simulates a mid-range phone on a slow connection. That simulated test is the one Google's ranking systems draw on, so the gap between how the site feels and how it scores is exactly the gap worth closing. The second fix is schema: your pages still carry a previous agency's Australian template, complete with their logo and a self-awarded five-star rating, which is exactly the kind of signal that erodes machine trust.
The triangulated core (26,985 a month across 112 terms) grows to a full category of about 36,400 searches a month once the long tail is counted. Strip out ads, shopping carousels, AI Overviews and pure-research queries, and roughly one search in five survives as a winnable organic click, a pool of about 7,100 a month. AI prompts are counted separately so nothing is double-counted. Modelled
One check we always run: the demand model is validated against your own Search Console and GA4, never just the tools. For you that check added garden rooms, summer houses, alpine pods and workshop demand the tools understate, all already ranking in your account. It also proved the consent territory is far bigger than any tool suggests: your own outbuilding-versus-dwelling explainer earned roughly 22,000 impressions last year on definitional consent queries alone (dwelling, outbuilding, and their variants), sitting at positions 4 to 11. Those queries never enter the click model, because a definition rarely earns a click, but they are precisely the citations AI engines lift, and that page is the seed the consent hub grows from. GSC + GA4
We built a library of 130 real questions Kiwis ask AI engines about your category, from Google's "People Also Ask", the consent rules every buyer hits, and the head-term intent map. Here is a sample, with roughly how often each comes up a month.
| Real question | Cluster | Est. monthly volume |
|---|---|---|
| Do I need building consent for a sleepout in NZ? | Consents & rules | ~450 |
| What can I build under the 30 square metre rule? | Consents & rules | ~350 |
| What is the best kitset cabin in NZ? | Kitset cabins | ~400 |
| How much does a sleepout cost in NZ? | Sleepouts | ~300 |
| Can you legally live in a sleepout? | Consents & rules | ~250 |
| What is a she shed and what do people use them for? | She sheds | ~250 |
| Can I put a cabin on my property and rent it on Airbnb? | Accommodation | ~200 |
| Can I run a hair salon from a shed at home? | Business sheds | ~150 |
A sample of the 130-question library, all of it in The data tab with per-question volume, priority and ownability. Volumes are directional floors (head-term anchor plus fan-out uplift). 124 of the 130 are questions you can uniquely or credibly own. Directional
And here is who the engines surface today, cluster by cluster, versus where you show up.
| Cluster | Surfaced today | Your brand? |
|---|---|---|
| Log cabins & kitset tiny homes | Fraemohs, SheShed, Trade Tested | Wins |
| She sheds | GardenHouse24, Sheds.co.nz, Kiwi Cabins, SheShed | Contested |
| Kitset cabins | Kitset Cabin Co, Sheds & Shelters, Outpost, Kitpods | Absent from page one |
| Sleepouts | Auckland Council, Outpost, Absolute Tiny Houses | Page two |
| Consent & cost questions | Council websites, forums | Absent |
Live Google results, August 2026. The consent row is the one to stare at: the question behind almost every cabin purchase is currently answered by councils, which cannot recommend a product. Live results
The same demand, grouped into the territories a plan executes against, each scored on how much of it you can realistically own. Priority weighs demand, whether AI is live, and whether you can win it uniquely.
| Territory | Coverage today | Demand | AI | Priority /5 | What we build |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consents & rules | FAQ posts, not structured | Med + AI | Yes | 5 | The definitive consent hub: the 30-square-metre rule, sleepout rules by council, can-you-live-in-it. The question behind every purchase, currently owned by councils. |
| Sleepouts | Category page, page two | High | Yes | 5 | The sleepout hub: cost guide, consent pairing, size and bathroom options. Your highest-intent gap. |
| Kitset cabins | Products rank, page three | High | - | 5 | The kitset cabin buying hub: best-of, price bands, DIY vs built, timber guides against a field of tiny specialists. |
| She sheds | Strong (the namesake) | High | Yes | 4 | Defend and extend: ideas, interiors, bathroom builds. Turn page-two rankings into the AI Overview citation. |
| Tiny homes & granny flats | One product page ranks | High | - | 4 | The kitset tiny home and granny-flat alternative story, the biggest adjacent volume in the book. |
| Garden sheds & potting sheds | Products only | High | - | 3 | Entry-lane guides that route premium timber demand to the smaller kitsets. |
| Pool houses & cabanas | Ranks top 10 | Med | - | 3 | Extend a bright spot: pool house consent, cost and design guides. |
| Home office, gym & salon | Use-case pages exist | Med | - | 3 | Sharpen the 28 use-case pages into answer format; the salon and gym pages already pull clicks. |
| Buying questions (timber, power, foundations) | FAQ posts rank | Med + AI | Yes | 4 | Your quiet winners (foundations, power, treated timber, black sheds) restructured with FAQPage schema so engines can lift them. |
| Off-grid & Airbnb | Product page only | Med | - | 3 | The off-grid and cabin-as-income stories, high order value and no NZ owner yet. |
Priority is a 1 to 5 score, where 5 means lead with it now; it is not a count of pieces. Content requirement: roughly 55 pieces to own the core (consents, sleepouts, kitset cabins, she sheds), and 100 to 140 over the six months for full category coverage. Unlike most brands we audit, much of this is reshaping, not writing from scratch: your 160 posts and 28 use-case pages are the raw material, restructured into answer format, retyped in schema, and interlinked with the shop. Every piece also routes to your catalogue and buying-guide downloads, which drove roughly 1,000 enquiries in the last year and are your measured conversion layer. The full cluster maths is in The data tab. Cluster model
| Brand | DR | What they are | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trade Tested | 58 | Big-box online marketplace | The volume shadow, not a specialist |
| SheShed | 16 | Premium NZ timber kitsets | The authority leader of the specialist field |
| GardenHouse24 | 10 | European flat-pack cabins | Closest product match, half your authority |
| Outpost Buildings | 5 | NZ kitset cabins and sleepouts | Ranks widest of the field today |
| Cabin Connect | 3 | Nordic timber kitsets | Near-identical positioning, minimal authority |
| Kiwi Cabins | 1 | Wooden sleepouts and cabins | Named she-shed product, no authority |
Ahrefs Domain Rating, August 2026. The competitors who outrank you on kitset and sleepout terms are doing it with less authority than you have, purely on page relevance. That is the most fixable gap in search. Ahrefs
Our honest sequencing: the foundations and content phases get you cited on your own answers and lift you from page two into the top three. Authority, the digital PR, round-up placements and community presence, is the engine that runs alongside and then compounds for years after. It is where most of the long-term share-of-voice sits.
| Source | What it provides |
|---|---|
| Keyword volumes, triangulated | Google Keyword Planner, SEMrush and Ahrefs, taken as the median of the sources returning a figure, with the source count carried on every row of the workbook. Single tools undercount NZ badly, so we never rely on one. |
| Branded vs non-branded | Only navigational "sheshed" queries count as branded. Category phrasings of "she shed" count as non-branded, because the brand is named after the category and the ranking data shows those searches behave like generic demand. Anonymised long-tail queries count as non-branded, stated here so the split is checkable. |
| The GSC and GA4 gap check | After the tool triangulation, the full 25,000-query Search Console set and the GA4 landing-page data are swept for demand the tools missed. Terms proven in your own account but thin in the tools enter the basket marked "GSC-proven"; themes with impressions but no New Zealand audience (checked country by country) are excluded rather than counted as opportunity. For you this added garden rooms, summer houses, alpine pods and workshop demand, and ruled out barn doors, shed paint and camping sheds as offshore noise. |
| Head-term anchors | Every AI prompt is anchored to the real, measurable keyword volumes of the search terms that sit underneath it. The anchor is the floor of what the prompt is worth, so nothing in the model rests on a guess. |
| Query fan-out uplift | One AI prompt triggers many hidden sub-searches inside the engine, and most of those carry zero traditional keyword volume. We apply a conservative 1.3 to 1.6x uplift to the anchor rather than guessing top-down, which is why our estimates are floors, not inflation. |
| AI answer verification | Which questions already trigger a Google AI Overview, verified in the live results. Every "AI live" flag in this document and the workbook is observed, not predicted. |
| Citation tracking | A fixed panel of your priority category questions, run monthly across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews, logging exactly which brands get named. The panel is confirmed with you at kick-off and the baseline is taken in week one, so every month is measured against day zero. |
| Your own ground truth | Search Console and GA4, last 12 months. Because $1.87M of revenue is unattributed in GA4, the model values a visit at the blended site-wide $8.96 rather than a per-channel rate; WooCommerce order data, once connected, replaces this with the measured figure. |
Measurement runs in our own platform, built for ecommerce brands, so the dashboard, the data and the method are yours to keep, not rented from a third-party tool. The full research behind every table here is in The data tab. Method